Case studies are used by the Knowledge Management Society (KMS) as a
tool in
promoting the dissemination of Knowledge management to other agents.
To begin with, case studies are used in teaching. Here the relationship
between
university and firm facilitates the externalization of tacit Knowledge.
What is
new is that these case studies relate to Basque firms, are mainly SMEs.
This is
an important point, since the managerial practice in question is
described in its
proper context. Moreover, the purpose of these case studies, from the
point of
view of the Knowledge Management Society, is to promote new Knowledge on
the basis of the socialization, internalization, and combination of
knowledge
through such agents as consultancies, universities, and management-related
institutions and other firms.
MANAGEMENT AND CONTEXT
Ideas about management need to be proved useful in practice. Managers
and other
professionals refer constantly to what works and what does not. The
problem is less a scientific
one than one of social acceptance. Social acceptance is a cultural
phenomenon in which social
agents must modify ideas for adaptation to the requirements of the local
culture.
There is a system in which agents and institutions interact in this
process. No one has
control over management. Rather managers, politicians, and consultants
are value creators,
forming part of the national skill formation system [Mohr, 1982].
EXTERNAL FORCES
Economic and political circumstances
NECESSARY CONDITIONS
Teachers in business administration
Politicians
Business groups
INTERACTION
Interaction between the groups
NEW KNOWLEDGE
TABLE 1. Adapted from Mohr (1982)
This theory of social context would appear to run counter to
globalization. One of the most
important topics dealt with in the area of globalization is that of
business knowledge, which has
emerged in full force over the last few years. Here knowledge has grown
exponentially, as can
be seen in the literature regarding management structures and their
various types.
The term globalization generally connotes a world that is becoming more
uniform, one in
which Western capitalism is imposing standardization on technological,
commercial, and
cultural phenomena. However, recent studies suggest that each region
establishes its own
characteristics. And this can indeed be seen in managerial practice.
With Withley we assert that
"management is more social- and context-dependent than other so-called
sciences."
On the other hand there is a tendency, in transferring managerial
Knowledge, to concentrate
on the context at source rather than on the context within which the
transfer will be received.
Thus a lot of managerial Knowledge is concentrated within large firms.
In large firms there is
no problem in acquiring such Knowledge, while a mere reduction in scale
may not be the
way to adapt it to the needs of SMEs. For one thing the management of
the smaller firm in
industry is not necessarily less complex than that of the large one.
Newel, Robertson, and Swan have shown that the professional associations
have a major
role to play in the diffusion of Knowledge by providing a forum for the
setting up of networks
between organizations.
The Knowledge Management Society in the Basque Country is a network of
universities,
business schools, consultants, firms, agencies, and public bodies,
engaged in producing and
disseminating business Knowledge. In the era of post-bureaucratic
organizations, knowledge
theory has come to endorse change and creativity, and some consultants
are developing products
aimed at the diffusion of management Knowledge. In particular, Knowledge
Management
Society is concerned first with creation, adaptation, diffusion, and
implementation, and secondly
with the institutional conditions for the social acceptance of ideas in
management. Knowledge
and action, theory and practice follow one another.
The Knowledge Management Society is put into practice in accordance with
the concept of
the KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT VALUE CHAIN
Creation Adaptation Dissemination Action
Creation Adaptation Diffusion Action
Universities
Business sch.
Consultants
Mass Media
Public Bodies
Associations
Firms
TABLE 2. Knowledge Management Value Chain
Managerial culture in the Basque Country is technically oriented, with
an emphasis on
SMEs, and with an incipient but strong commitment of working with public
bodies. The Basque
Country has emerged from an industrial crisis but many companies have
been transformed and
have become leaders. Accordingly we suspect that there is a lot of
implicit knowledge to be
disseminated.
Case studies are a powerful tool, useful as an aid not only to teaching
but also to making
knowledge available to others and thus to enhancing the performance of
firms in a given region.
Where the objective is to introduce new, advanced practices into firms
less aware of
developments, the credibility of the company or manager supplying the
case history must greatly
bear on the effectiveness of dissemination, since many managers are
looking for knowledge that
can be translated into action. A detailed case history will help
managers by affording lessons for
learning, especially if it is chosen in light of the geographical and
cultural conditions in question.
THE KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT VALUE : CIRCULAR PERSPECTIVE
In a linear perspective the agents chiefly concerned with creating fresh
management
knowledge are to be found in the academic community. The fruit of their
research must be
converted into tools and methods so that firms can apply it. This
conversion is the task of
consulting firms. Academics, consultants, publishers, pioneer firms, and
so on publicize the
new advances. The process comes to an end when the knowledge is adopted
by firms in
general. Their role is passive to the extent that they simply take
aboard the new knowledge
coming from the external agents.
The foregoing might be regarded as a linear view of the matter. A
circular view is closer to
Schumpeter's theory of the firm. Here it is recognized that knowledge
can be created by firms as
well, even if their means differ from those of academics and
consultants. The theoretical work
of Tackeuchi & Nonaka in regard to the mechanisms used by firms to
create Knowledge is truly
insightful:
* A given firm, or individuals within it, can receive knowledge from
external agents or
from other members of the organization, but the process in one case is
different from that in the
other.
* A given firm, or individuals within it, can create vast stores of
tacit knowledge, but this
must become explicit if it is to be shared by other agents, or by other
individuals in the firm.
Where the question is how they should relate to one another, this new
perspective represents
a challenge for the various agents involved in the management Knowledge
value chain. The
status quo is no longer good enough.
CASE STUDIES AS A TOOL USED IN UNCOVERING AND DISSEMINATING
MANAGERIAL KNOWLEDGE
USING WRITTEN CASE STUDIES TO EXTERNALIZE KNOWLEDGE
If we take a circular view of the Knowledge value chain, and note the
importance of the firm
as creating agent, then we are designing instruments that make it
possible to pick up the
knowledge generated and accumulated in company organizations. This is
the first step in the
process leading to its dissemination.
Managerial Knowledge is basically tacit, so that it must be drawn out,
arranged, and
externalized. The methods used must enable the investigator to
understand the circumstances in
which the Knowledge has come into being and in which he finds its
effective application. This
means making a major effort to understand the business context in
question, as well as the
history behind it.
The methods already developed for the writing up of cases1, and in a
broader framework for
social research, may prove a valuable aid toward achievement of the
objective. Where these
research methods are not known, and, as often happen in a business
environment, time is not as
abundant as it might be, external specialists should be involved. These
will include researchers,
consultants, and students.
Naturally, any research method employed in uncovering tacit knowledge
should ascribe
major importance to the members of the organization in question. The
researcher must observe
and delimit the circumstances, formulate hypotheses and test them, get
information, arrange it
and write it up, and so on, but the Knowledge and the guidelines that
might be used in getting at
it are inside the members of the firm. Interviews with important people
in the organization and
in its environment are the most appropriate aid to picking up that
information in its entirety. It is
useful to consult the written and graphic material available (brochures,
memos, web pages,
accounting data, questionnaires mailed in by executives), but this is
not enough.
CASES AS AN INSTRUMENT IN THE DISSEMINATION OF MANAGERIAL
KNOWLEDGE
When the Knowledge has been externalized, then the risk of its loss,
from the point of view
of the firm or of society, is naturally lessened2. Its attractive and
faithful exposition in the form
of company cases will facilitate its diffusion.
On the one hand, it may in this form be easily conveyed to the actual
members of the
organization in question. It will be an interesting instrument for use
in communicating and
educating, for use along with other means of dissemination employed
inside the firm3.
On the other hand, knowledge may be conveyed to individuals outside the
firm. Here we are
concerned with the use of cases in external diffusion and management
training.
Executives generally wish to acquire knowledge that can be related to
what they already
know, that will find practical application in real situations, and that
will help them in the work
they already do. The learning undertaken should be suited to these
particularities. In addition, it
should entail experimentation and reflection4.
If we take for reference the classification proposed by Ausubel,
learning may range from
rote to significant, the aim in the latter case being to raise the
quality and intensity of the links
established between the new material and the old. Or it may range from
learning by reception,
i.e. where the teacher is the main transmitter, to learning by
independent discovery, i.e.
discovery with external aid. Somewhere in between we find guided
discovery (See Table 4)
Learning via cases is thus significant, or it may be tantamount to
learning by discovery
(independently, or, more probably, under guidance).
Depending on the manner in which it is carried out, it shares a field of
operation with
teaching methods that seek basically to develop skills, such as guided
discussion, role-playing,
structured exercises, business games, group undertakings, seminars, or
even reading. Without
doubt, however, it exhibits different characteristics. (See Table 5)
The case method makes it possible to move appropriately and directly
from theory to
practice, to the acquisition of information regarding life as it really
is for executives in the firm,
with a look at team work, the taking of decisions, the summing up of
information, the exercise
of creativity, and oral reasoning.
The Knowledge and skills here referred to can be dealt with in various
ways. There may be
variations in the method of case study, e.g. the Kogan method [García
del Junco and Castellanos
, 1997], the situation method [García del Junco and Castellanos, 1998]
and the critical incident
method [García del Junco and Castellanos, 1997].
These achievements are of particular interest in higher-level business
courses, i.e. when there
is already a theoretical basis on which to undertake significant
learning, as well as continuous
and postgraduate training. In this latter case the student's experience
may conduce to more
active participation, as well as to more efficient use of class time,
with assimilation and
swifter application of the proposals that have arisen.5
In whichever case, the didactic value of this method like that of any
other, derives more from
the context in which it is used than from its intrinsic qualities. The
context is what gives it real
value and allows one to adjust the objectives and mechanics of each
exercise and training
method to the interests and potentialities of the students, trainers,
and firms.
Thus the one case, on paper, may be used in very different ways. It may
be used as a basis
for taking business decisions in a group or in the classroom, whether or
not the students have
experience. It may be used as an example of corporate strategies within
the framework of a
teacher's exposition. Or it may be used as reading material in relation
to outstanding practices
and events in a business, suitable for the interested student or as a
vehicle for conveying
executive Knowledge, cultural values, or any other information of
interest to the members of the
organization in question.
Significant learning Clarification of Well-designed self- Scientific
research
relationship between instruction (new architecture or
concepts music)
Conferences or School work in the Strictly routine
presentation of most laboratory research, or
of the textbooks intellectual
production
Rote learning Application of tables Solutions to Trial-and-error
to multiply problems formulae problems
Learning by Learning by guided Learning by
reception discovery independent
discovery
TABLE 4. Types of learning (Ausubel)
Significant learning Tutorials with Tutorials, seminars, Group or
individual
principal paper group or individual undertakings, guided
undertakings, guided discussion,
discussion, Cases Cases
Principal paper, Readings, structured Cases, role-playing,
lectures, computer- exercises, Cases, free discussion,
aided teaching Seminars, business business games
games, computer-
aided teaching, role-
playing, guided
discussion
Rote learning Memorization of Structured exercises, Business games
notes and texts Cases, business
games
Learning by Learning by guided Learning by
reception discovery independent
discovery
TABLE 5.Teaching methods (based on Ausubel)
CASE STUDIES AT THE KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SOCIETY
The Knowledge Management Society in the Basque Country is using case
studies as an aid
not only to teaching but also to collaboration between agents of the
management system, the
final aim being to make people aware of new ideas in management.
n The most traditional way to use the case method is focused on the
learning process of
students or practitioners in formation and educational programs. From
the point of view
of learning process is a way to internalize the explicit knowledge
transferred at the formal
educational program, by the assumption of the manager role at the case
study
n Our experience shows that the case method can also be used inside the
firm on which
the case study in being based, to achieve a process of externalization
of the tacit
knowledge created by the firm through their experience.
n Once this process of externalization has been accomplished, the
results are not only
useful for the firm but also can be diffused and adapted by other firms
and agents of the
Knowledge Value Chain.
A relation of this sort between the academic and business worlds makes
it possible to rectify
one of the most serious deficiencies where the creation of new knowledge
by practitioners is
concerned, as well as one of the major restrictions on the process of
learning through experience.
It provides the time needed to reflect in a structured way on decisions
and initiatives taken in
the past.
METHODOLOGY
The principal distinguishing feature in our method is that cases are
closed and finished. In a
given case there is no first part, devoted to exposition, followed by a
reply. And the student is in
no way put in the place of the decision-makers.
A case adheres to the following rules, which in this way contribute to
the achievement of the
objectives described in the course of the present paper:
Selection of Cases
* Firms with growth rates above average in the sector, associated with
the generation of
employment, and enjoying a certain social prestige. The key to success
should lie
largely in changes undertaken in management.
Advantages
* They act as driving forces, providing encouragement to firms that are
reluctant to use
advanced management tools.
Real and Nearby Data
* Names and other data are real.
Advantages
* Better credibility.
* Concentration is on Basque industry, specifically industrial SMEs.
* Use of the cases in different situations between the university, the
firm, consultants, etc.
The Expressions Are Respected
* The writers are university professors of the highest level, but they
do not write up reality as
they would like it to be, or from a critical point of view. Their aim is
to get the facts, sum them
up, and arrange them in organized fashion.
Advantages
* The teacher learns in the process.
* There is no repetition of theoretical schemata already set forth in
books on management.
Rather the approach is to adapt this knowledge to particular
circumstances.
* Real tacit knowledge is conveyed.
Cases Are Not Classified
* They do not belong to any area, e.g. Marketing, Human Resources, and
Finance.
Advantages
* They make it possible to take a closer look at corporate circumstances
and at how
knowledge is applied in management, as executives know it.
A Work Nucleus, Various Derivatives
* A work nucleus is considered that has inspired the management of the
firm and
hypothetically has contributed to its success.
* In the notes for the teacher there are other themes suggested for
discussion and use.
Advantages
* They can be used with absolute flexibility in various areas.
* Overall it is demonstrated that there are many routes to success.
The Teacher's Notes Are Not A Solution for the Case
* No solution is proposed. The teacher does not have control of the
case.
Advantages
* They are useful especially for open discussions, examinations, group
work, comparative
work, etc.
* They can be used on a visit to the firm or on executives' visits.
CONCLUSIONS
The Knowledge Management Society at the Basque Country (Spain) is using
case studies
using a wide scope, thus is to convert tacit knowledge embedded in firms
into explicit
knowledge. The writing and teaching of case studies is used in a process
of knowledge
management conversion.
ENDNOTES
1To include a reference or two consulted in preparing the methodology
employed in the study of advanced-
management firms in the Basque Country.
2 The chance that Knowledge will be lost through the disappearance of
its possessors is reduced, but there is a
greater possibility that it will be shared, and this may be an aid to
the enhancement of operations within the company
in question, in other companies, and in society generally. There is,
however, the chance that competitive advantage
will be lost. The firm will therefore wish to determine how much
diffusion is wanted, and what its scope should be.
See Grant, R.M. (1991), "The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive
Advantage: Implications for Strategic
Formulation", California Management Review, 33, pp. 114-135. And also
Grant, R.M. (1996), "Toward a
Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm", Strategic Management Journal, vol.
17, pp. 109-122.
3For a closer look at the types and mechanisms of internal Knowledge
diffusion, see the following:
Fernández, E. (1996): Innovación, tecnología y alianzas estratégicas.
Factores clave de la competencia. Cívitas,
Madrid.
Grant, R.M. (1996), "Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm", op.
cit.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company: How
Japanese Companies Create the
Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
4Mintzberg, H. (1983): La naturaleza del trabajo directivo, Airel,
Barcelona. "Learning is most effective when the
student develops a skill in as realistic a situation as possible and
later examines explicitly what he has done.... He
should put skills into practice and examine the results, and he should
study the critical comments of someone versed
in the matter." (p. 246)
5Snow (1976), cited by Díez de Castro and others (1989, p. 164),
observed that low-order managerial achievements,
such as the identification or description of object or subject, are more
easily attained to via more passive methods,
methods more controlled by the instructor, e.g. exposition, reading,
debates. On the other hand, managerial
objectives at higher level, e.g. the acquisition of skills for the
resolution of complex problems, call for methods in
which the student's contribution is more active (cases, experiments,
simulations, etc.).
REFERENCES
Ausubel, D.P. Psicología educativa. Un punto de vista cognitivo. (Ed.
Trillas, Mexico, 1976)
Díez de Castro, E.; Leal, A.; and Martín, F., "La enseñanza de
administración de empresas", Revista de Economía y
Empresa, (1989), vol. X. no. 24.25, pp. 159-176.
García del Junco, J. and Castellanos Verdugo, M, "El método de las
situaciones: herramientas de diagnóstico y
decisión", Dirección y Organización, (1998) 19, pp. 95-115.
García de Junco, J. and Castellanos Verdugo, M., "La formación de
directivos a través del estudio de incidentes",
Capital Humano, (1997) 102, pp.25-31
García del Junco, J. and others, Casos prácticos de Economía de la
Empresa. (Pirámide, Madrid, 1998)
García del Junco, J. and others, Casos prácticos de Economía de la
Empresa. (Pirámide, Madrid, 1998)
Gimeno, J., Teoría de la enseñanza y desarrollo del currículo, (Anaya,
Salamanca, 1985)
Mohr, Laurence, Explaining Organizational Behaviour: The limits and
possibilities of Theory and Research.
(San Francisco CA: Jossey Bass, 1982)
Mucchielli, R., La Méthode des cas, L'Enterprise Moderne, (Paris, 1968)
Newell, S., Robertson, M. and Swan, J., Proffessional Associations as
Brokers, Facilitating Networking and the
Diffusion of new Ideas, in The Diffusion and Comsuption of Business
Knowledge (Alvarez, J.L, McMillan
Press Ltd, 1998)
Withley, Richard, European Business Systems (London: Sage, 1992)
Nota: Es probable que en esta página web no aparezcan todos los elementos del presente documento. Para tenerlo completo y en su formato original recomendamos descargarlo desde el menú en la parte superior
El
Sr. Arbonies es licenciado en ciencias Empresariales por la ESTE
(Universidad de Deusto) y Mphil (Master por Investigación) por la
Universidad de Sussex en TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT,
desarrollando la investigación en la prestigiosa Science Policy Research
Unit (SPRU) de la citada Universidad. Angel L. Arboníes Ortiz ha
desarrollado una intensa actividad en diversos campos relacionados con
la gestión empresarial, especialmente desde el punto de vista de la
consultoría. Fue Director Comercial de Gogar S. Coop, para pasar a ser
consultor en Azter y en el centro de Diseño Industrial, DZ. En esta
institución fue consultor de marketing dentro de la División de
Promoción, y responsable de Auditoría de Diseño. Después de su
especialización en el campo de la Gestión de la Innovación, dirigió para
la Diputación Foral de Bizkaia, dos cursos avanzados de gestión: "Diseño
y Desarrollo de Nuevos Productos" y "Gestión de la Innovación". Durante
cuatro años ha sido responsable del Area de empresa de IKEI, donde ha
contribuido decisivamente al crecimiento de esta división, lanzando la
Consultoría en Gestión de la Innovación. Entre sus trabajos relacionados
con la innovación, destacan Innoval, Dirección Estratégica del programa
Reto. Igualmente dentro de IKEI, ha sido consultor en estrategia para
importantes empresas e instituciones. Es autor del libro "Nuevos
enfoques en la innovación de productos para la empresa industrial"
publicado por la diputación Foral de Bizkaia, y reeditado en 1993 por
Editorial Díaz de santos y APD. Es autor del "Manual de Gestión de
Diseño" para DZ. Es miembro del Design Management Institute, The
Strategic Planning Society y de ISPIM (International Society for
Professionals on Innovation Management). Después de fundar y dirigir el
Cluster del Conocimiento durante 5 años, es actualmente el Director
General de MIK, Mondragon Centro de Investigación en Gestión, centro
corporativo de Mondragón Corporación Cooperativa.
Acerca de GestioPolis
Participar en la comunidad
Derechos de Autor
GestioPolis es la primera comunidad de conocimiento en negocios de Hispanoamérica
Derechos Reservados sobre el concepto del sitio web
GestioPolis.com
© 2008 Carlos López
| Hazte miembro de GestioPolis |
|
Y Descarga 11 eBooks
GRATIS |